Shoaib Daniyal
Much
is made of the rivalry between Vallabhbhai Patel and Jawaharlal Nehru
for prime ministership – a debate that often overlooks just how popular
Nehru was among the masses of India. Patel himself told American journalist Vincent Sheean at a massively attended Congress rally in Mumbai, “They come for Jawahar, not for me.”
After
Saturday’s massive win for the Bharatiya Janata Party in the Uttar
Pradesh Assembly election, though, Nehru seems to have a challenger.
Speaking at a post-results press conference, BJP president Amit Shah claimed, “Modi has emerged as the most popular [Indian] leader since independence.”
Modi, the new Nehru
While comparisons between Indira Gandhi and Modi have been made for some time now, Shah took it one step further. Modi had even outstripped Nehru, he claimed implicitly.
For
any watcher of Indian history, this is a bold claim. In the pantheon of
India’s founding fathers, Nehru ranks second only to Mohandas Gandhi.
So unchallenged was Nehru’s power that it is often described as the
“Nehruvian consensus”: the vision that is almost single-handedly
responsible for building the post-colonial republic.
While
a full historical appraisal of Amit Shah’s boast remains to be made, on
raw numbers, the BJP president’s arrow isn’t that far off the mark. On
votes and political charisma, Modi’s mass appeal is truly on course to
reach the heights that at one time only Nehru could lay claim to.
2014’s small win
Narendra
Modi’s 2014 Lok Sabha win, while commendable, pales when compared to
previous elections. In fact, Modi’s was the smallest vote share ever to
win a simple majority in the lower house of India’s Parliament.
Trending
- A short history of bhang in India
- After Jio and Airtel, Idea Cellular announces free incoming roaming calls
- Goa's 'legally legitimate but morally illegitimate government': Anger in state as BJP stakes claim
Far
from beating Nehru, Modi in 2014 trailed the Indian National Congress
vote share even in the post-Emergency 1977 Lok Sabha election, when
Indira Gandhi crashed to defeat winning only 154 seats.
However, that doesn’t mean Modi has fallen out from the race.
2017 jackpot
Since
2014, Narendra Modi has used the post of prime minister and the vast
powers of the Union government to push his political appeal.
To
maybe truly appreciate Shah’s claim, it is instructive to compare vote
shares of the Congress in Uttar Pradesh and the BJP’s 2017 win in the
state.
In
Uttar Pradesh, as it now stands, the BJP’s 2017 vote share has
outstripped every performance of the Congress in each Uttar Pradesh
state election it fought under the leadership of Indira Gandhi.
Moreover, the BJP’s 2017 vote share is higher than even the Congress’ in
1962 – the final Uttar Pradesh election the Grand Old Party fought
under Nehru’s leadership.
This
is no small achievement. One-sixth of India’s population lives in Uttar
Pradesh. Apart from the sheer weight of numbers, there is the political
capital the state carries. It is hardly a coincidence that every prime
minister to command a majority in the Lok Sabha on his/her own has won
an election from Uttar Pradesh. Even Narendra Modi, a Gujarati,
abandoned his state and chose to represent the Uttar Pradesh city of
Varanasi in Parliament. The importance of the scale of the 2017 Uttar
Pradesh win for Modi’s stature can, therefore, hardly be emphasised
enough.
And
it is not only Uttar Pradesh. The Bharatiya Janata Party is slowly but
surely taking over much of the Indian Union. Take a look at this map.
1967
was not a good year for the Congress. It lost power in six states
leading to the map (left) above. This was just three years after Nehru
died and was at a time when the vast majority of India’s electorate had
seen the Congress’ role in the freedom movement themselves. In spite of
the reverses of 1967, in every which way, the Congress was a powerhouse
and would dominate national politics for the next four decades.
In
2017, the BJP is in government in 15 states. In 1967, the Congress
ruled 10. That the BJP in 2017 – with less than three years in office
for Modi as prime minister – has overtaken the Congress in 1967 is,
therefore, remarkable. Moreover, this is at a time when the BJP is on
its way up. With the Opposition in disarray, the saffron spread of the
BJP is only set to increase. Elections in Karnataka, for example,
scheduled in 2018 have the Bharatiya Janata Party as a clear
front-runner, pitted against a bedraggled Congress. Modi’s march to
Nehrudom will only continue.
The Modivian consensus
Nehru
used his unchallenged power to fashion the new republic. The Congress
was a largely conservative party, but so popular was Nehru that a
resignation threat was enough for most Congress right-wingers to fall in
line since many of them owed their seats, power and privilege to
Nehru’s personal connection with the voters.
In
return, Nehru got his way with policy. During his time, the office of
prime minister clearly overshadowed the party. He was able to pilot
progressive legislation like the Hindu Code bills, bringing modern
Western law to replace Hinduism’s age-old customs. The Nehruvian state
aggressively pushed secularism, trying to make India’s Muslim minority
feel relatively safe after the turmoil of Partition.
Narendra
Modi, on the other hand, is ideologically a Right-wing conservative,
his ideology fashioned by his decades as a long-time Rashtriya
Swayamsevak Sangh worker. A Nehru-like level of power and influence
might mean Modi will affect large-scale changes that yank the country
sharply to the Right.
He
has, in fact, already kept a razor-sharp focus on the issues that
matter to Hindutva. In this election, for example, the BJP did not
bother to field a single Muslim from Uttar Pradesh – the victory was
purely due to the party’s Hindu vote bank. Moreover, as prime minister,
Modi has made sure to project a muscular Hindu identity. He is not shy of mixing pujas and politicking.
As Modi approaches Nehruvian levels of popularity, this very popularity will probably mean the end of Nehru’s India.
No comments:
Post a Comment